Leer en español: Cuando el capital de riesgo es el dinero equivocado (y qué levantar en su lugar)
Educational only — not investment, legal or tax advice.
Venture capital gets most of the headlines, so many founders assume raising a round is the default. It isn’t. VC is a very specific kind of money, built for a very specific kind of company. If your company isn’t that kind, taking VC can hurt you more than help you.
Why VC needs your company to be huge
Venture funds make most of their money from a handful of very big wins. Data from Correlation Ventures, covering more than 21,000 US venture financings between 2004 and 2013, found that 65% failed to return the money invested and only 4% returned ten times or more. A later Correlation update, measured by dollars invested, found under 4% of capital in exits over a decade made 10x or more, and 37% returned less than 1x.
That shapes everything a VC does. If most bets lose money, the winners have to pay for all the losers. So a VC isn’t asking “will this be a good business?” They’re asking “could this return the whole fund?”
A company that grows to $10 million in revenue, is profitable and pays its founders well is a great outcome for the founders. For a fund that needs one company to return hundreds of millions, it barely registers.
The growth VC expects
There is no official number, but a well-known rule of thumb in software investing is “triple, triple, double, double, double”: once it reaches a few million in annual recurring revenue, a company triples revenue for two years, then doubles it for three. Treat it as a heuristic, not data. It shows the scale of ambition behind a typical venture round.
There is also a clock. A venture fund has a fixed life, which Carta describes as typically eight to ten years for VC and PE funds. The fund has to return money to its own investors by then, so it needs your company to be sold or listed within that window. We cover what that means for control in what you really give up when you take VC.
Five signs VC is not a fit
- Your market has a ceiling. A strong niche business can be very profitable and still never be big enough for a venture fund.
- You want to grow at your own pace. VC money is meant to be spent fast to grow fast.
- You never want to sell. VCs need an exit, through a sale or an IPO.
- Your margins are thin. Venture growth usually means losing money for years before it pays off.
- You already make money. If customers fund your growth, you may not need to sell equity at all.
What to raise instead
| Option | How it works | Best for | What you give up |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bootstrapping | Grow from customer revenue | Profitable or fast-to-revenue businesses | Speed |
| Revenue-based financing | Repay a share of monthly revenue up to a cap | Steady recurring revenue | A share of revenue until the cap |
| Venture debt | A loan, often with warrants, alongside an equity round | Extending runway after a round | Interest, some warrants |
| Grants and non-dilutive programmes | Public money for research and innovation | Deep tech, R&D-heavy companies | Time spent on applications and reporting |
| Angels | Individuals investing their own money | Early stage, smaller rounds | Some equity, usually less control |
A few notes on each:
Bootstrapping can go very far. Mailchimp, founded in 2001, was bought by Intuit in 2021 for about $12 billion in cash and stock. According to PitchBook data cited by Fortune at the time, it had no outside funding or venture capital backing.
Revenue-based financing gives you capital today, repaid as a share of monthly revenue until you hit a cap, typically 1.3x to 2x what you received according to Capchase. No board seat, no dilution, but you need real revenue. Full breakdown in our RBF guide.
Venture debt is not a replacement for VC. As Silicon Valley Bank puts it, “the first rule of venture debt is that it follows equity; it doesn’t replace it.” It’s mostly for companies that already have venture backing.
Grants like the EIC Accelerator in Europe or SBIR in the US fund innovation without taking equity. They are competitive and slow, but they can fund the riskiest part of the technology.
From the investor’s side of the table
When I looked at deals, one of the first questions was whether the company could get big enough to matter for the fund. Many companies I said no to were good businesses. They just needed different money. Saying “VC isn’t for us” is not a failure. It’s often the smartest decision a founder makes.
The short version
VC works only for companies that can become very large, very fast, and sell within the life of a fund. If that’s not you, bootstrapping, revenue-based financing, grants or angels may get you further, and you keep more of what you build.
Sources
- Seth Levine: Venture outcomes are even more skewed than you think (Correlation Ventures data)
- Correlation Ventures: Venture capital, we’re still not normal
- Carta: Limited partnership agreement, definition and key terms
- Intuit: Intuit to acquire Mailchimp (13 September 2021)
- Fortune: Intuit to acquire Mailchimp in $12 billion deal (13 September 2021)
- Silicon Valley Bank: How does venture debt work?
- Capchase: Revenue-based financing
Written by Fabian Cisneros. Educational only — not investment, legal or tax advice. See the full disclaimer.
Leave a comment